Commit 10ed424f authored by beorn7's avatar beorn7

Update benchmarks.

Once my PRs are in and 0.13.0 is released, we can merge this to
reflect the better performance.
parent 19bb6bc9
...@@ -199,11 +199,11 @@ you an idea, here are some results from benchmarks: ...@@ -199,11 +199,11 @@ you an idea, here are some results from benchmarks:
* On an older 8-core machine with Intel Core i7 CPUs and two spinning * On an older 8-core machine with Intel Core i7 CPUs and two spinning
disks (Samsung HD753LJ) in a RAID-1 setup, Prometheus sustained an disks (Samsung HD753LJ) in a RAID-1 setup, Prometheus sustained an
ingestion rate of 18k samples per second, belonging to 56k time ingestion rate of 34k samples per second, belonging to 170k time
series, scraped from 200 targets. series, scraped from 600 targets.
* On a modern server with SSD, Prometheus sustained an ingestion rate * On a modern server with SSD, Prometheus sustained an ingestion rate
of 320k samples per second, belonging to 1.7M time of 340k samples per second, belonging to 2M time
series, scraped from 1100 targets. series, scraped from 1800 targets.
In both cases, there were no obvious bottlenecks. Various stages of the In both cases, there were no obvious bottlenecks. Various stages of the
processing pipelines reached their limits more or less at the same processing pipelines reached their limits more or less at the same
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment